
Twenty minutes after reporting the NYPD action to corral & misdirect protesters on the Brooklyn Bridge, The New York Times revised its story to use investor friendly, MSM talking point & call the event a "tense showdown".
Captured in a screenshot, the myth of a liberal media is confirmed but the reference is not their political stance but their measure of voracity.
Twenty minutes after reporting the NYPD action to corral & misdirect protesters on the Brooklyn Bridge, The New York Times revised its story to use investor friendly, MSM talking point & call the event a "tense showdown".
Wall Street has a real dilema on its hands this time as the traditional deployment of crisis management PR keeps them from getting out in front of the stories and massaging the facts because too many folks globally are wired in live!

Manhattan view of Brooklyn Bridge Saturday, October 1 ~ NYPD blanket the area while protesters and observers from pedestrian pathways are released and many hundreds remaining are arrested.
These dipsticks are still buying time between infomercials to successfully sell drugs to the target demographic and can't wrap their minds around the fact that the revolution confronting them is not gonna run on Press Released faxes.
It becomes a Herculean, albeit lucrative folly to tackle the Crisis Management PR for Occupy Wall Street, because a paid gig will never draw the passion of individual commitment and they are a small piece hired by the 1% and our numbers are virtually limitless.



